Horizon Additive Manufacturing Leverages 3D Printing for Better Production of Aerospace Components

IMTS

Share this Article

From model airplanes to drones to jets and rockets, you may be amazed to find out how many aircraft are flying today with 3D printed parts. And this trend will only continue to increase, propelled further by consortiums such as the UK’s ATI Horizon Additive Manufacturing as they work to develop progressive manufacturing methods in aerospace.

Horizon AM is currently focused on new additive manufacturing techniques for producing metal, lightweight parts for aircraft. They will be creating production methods that are more affordable and create less waste, allowing for near net shapes to be produced on demand.

“Having established viable methods to produce flying components manufactured in this way the aim is to exploit the high geometric complexity and multi-material capability of these manufacturing methods in order to realise advanced aircraft components for the next generation of aircraft, thereby establishing the UK at the forefront of aerospace design and manufacturing,” states the Aerospace Technology Institute in a recent press release about Horizon and a new case study.

The consortium was founded in 2014 by a group of partners interested in creating new AM techniques for aerospace parts. Led by GKN Aerospace, the consortium also includes partnerships with:

The consortium’s project consists of 11 work packages right now, including the following:

  • AM materials
  • Design requirements
  • Design for AM
  • Optimization
  • Polymer AM
  • AM process understanding
  • Post processing for AM
  • NDT for AM

“The ATI Horizon (AM) programme focuses on progressing three key AM technologies through GKN’s Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) process in order to development them into viable production processes. To date, TRL 3 have been achieved for Polymer AM and TRL 4 for LPB. It is also collaborated with other ATI projects and GKN sites to produce flight test hardware for flight trials of next generation ice protection systems developed in WIST and ALFET. After TRL 4 focus will shift from the process to product development with a focus on TRL 4 for Polymer. TRL 5 for LBP and the continuing industrialisation of the EBM technology achieving TRL 4 for a high rate engine component,” states the case study.

The consortium has increased staff to 20 engineers (from only eight, previously), and they now have 10 3D printers, in comparison to their previous two. They are working with multiple materials in their material analysis lab, focusing on production with no post processing, and they have ‘increased collaborations’ with AM customers.

“Due to the technology development achieved through ATI Horizon, GKN were excellently positioned to collaborate with an existing customer to produce flight trial hardware which required a rapid delivery. This collaboration led to further work being awarded to GKN to other areas of the customers’ business where AM could be applied.”

Two case studies were completed, with the first centering around the NextGeneration Ice Detection system as the consortium worked with other major entities as well, to include other GKN divisions. They used laser powder bed components to hold a novel aircraft Optical Ice Detector (OID) and next generation ice protection heater mats.

“The assembly was attached onto an instrument pylon and flight tested using the BAe 146-301 large Atmospheric Research Aircraft (ARA) owned by Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements (FAAM),” states the team in their case study.

The project ‘matured’ the following:

  • Laser Powder Bed AM towards TRL 5
  • Optical Ice Detectors towards TRL 6
  • Ice Protection Heater Mats (ALFET) towards TRL 6

“The AM parts needed to interface with the aircraft’s instrumentation canisters, the OID sensors and an external video camera used to verify if ice had accreted. It was important to minimise the surface roughness of the parts external surfaces and maintain the tight tolerances needed between the AM parts and the other metallic components,” the researchers add.

The second case study investigates Design for Additive Manufacture (DfAM) throughout the whole life cycle. The researchers explored simulation driven design methodologies on an elevator hinge bracket. And with simulation driven design, they found they could fabricate complex parts that are 50 percent lighter. Not only that, the parts are now affordable to produce with 3D printing. This means wing designs offer greater performance, efficiency, and even savings on the bottom line. Consequently, aircraft engines will operate more efficiently too.

“The aim of this work package is to plan a single AM process for five (5) distinct optimised designs of an Elevator Hinge Bracket using five (5) different software packages. The designs are to be built and mechanically tested on a rig with the positive expectation that all pass,” explains the team.

They cite benefits of the elevator hinge bracket as follows:

  • Reduced buy-to-fly ratio from 3.5 to approximately 2 – 1.5
  • Weight reduction of up to 53%
  • Potential reduction of number of parts
  • Possible reduction of design time by 10 times

“The study provides evidence that parts which are designed within limits of traditional manufacturing processes can be replaced with optimised parts that offer cost and weight savings. The wider application for assemblies of structural components being built as one part in AM has been identified as a further potential area for development.

The relatively limited scope of this project has developed the technology to TRL4 in the aircraft structures application. The work has been validated by static strength testing of one of the parts. This technology will mature to TRL6 and undergo flight demonstration,” conclude the researchers.

Find out more about the consortium and their latest case studies here.

What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts; join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts below. 

[Source / Images: Horizon Additive Manufacturing]

 

Share this Article


Recent News

Interview: Rethinking 3D Printing for High-Volume Production with Exentis

3D Printing Financials: Prodways’ Q1 2024 Revenue Drop and Accounting Overhaul



Categories

3D Design

3D Printed Art

3D Printed Food

3D Printed Guns


You May Also Like

3D Printing Financials: Fathom Struggles in Financial Quicksand During Critical Transition

Facing a year of key transitions and financial pressures, Fathom (Nasdaq: FTHM) has filed its annual report for 2023 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The document outlines...

Latest Earnings Overview for Australian 3D Printing Firms Titomic and AML3D

Australian 3D printing manufacturing firms Titomic (ASX: TTT) and AML3D (ASX: AL3) reported their financial results for the period from July to December 2023, marking the first half of their...

3D Printing Webinar and Event Roundup: April 7, 2024

Webinars and events in the 3D printing industry are picking back up this week! Sea-Air-Space is coming to Maryland, and SAE International is sponsoring a 3D Systems webinar about 3D...

3D Printing Financials: Unpacking Farsoon and BLT’s 2023 Performance

In the Chinese 3D printing industry, two companies, Farsoon (SHA: 688433) and Bright Laser Technologies, or BLT (SHA: 688333), have recently unveiled their full-year earnings for 2023. Farsoon reported increases...